Dani Shapiro

On Betrayal (2)

When I wrote Black & White, I had many questions in mind, questions that I wanted to try to answer by exploring the world of the novel.  First and foremost among these was the subject of privacy.  Where does a writer (or an artist of any kind) draw the line?  Is it all right for us to write about our parents, but not our children?  Or our parents, but only after they're dead?  Or children, but only when they're small?  Our spouses, but only if it's flattering?  Our friends, but only if they're either disguised, or it's pre-approved?  If we write fiction, are all bets off because it's fiction, no matter how thinly-veiled?   A writer's life is her laboratory.  Bits and pieces float up to the surface.  Wallpaper, for instance.  Or the smell of a stew simmering on a stove.  Or the way someone's mouth curves around a particular word.  Or a caught bit of dialogue.  Or an old couple and the way they hold hands.  Who knows what it is that  sparks us, that creates Didion's shimmer, of which I've written before?

I have always been mindful of the responsibility of being someone who publishes work in which others often show up as characters.  I never feel like I'm trolling for information, or am lying in wait for the next bit of inspiration to thwack me upside the head.  That isn't how it works, at least not for me.  But I am aware that there is a certain distrust.  A sense, in others, that maybe I'm taking mental notes.  And maybe, in a way, I am.  After all, that's one of the great advantages of being writer (and there are so many down sides; as I write this on tour, sandwiched in a middle seat on an airplane with a very large snoring man whose head is dangerously close to lolling on my shoulder...)  But I digress.  The upside is in the aliveness.  In the sense that around any corner, there is the possibility of something that feels exciting, real, true, worth exploring.  Something that goes ping.  That shimmers.

When that happens, what is a writer's responsibility?  There is a fine line between worrying about betrayal--and self-censorship.  There is an equally fine line between hearing  that little voice perched on your shoulder (on all of our shoulders) who tell us that we can't/shouldn't/mustn't -- and knowing whether that voice is speaking for the right reasons--or the wrong ones.  In my experience, most writers who are concerned about hurting others in their work--don't.  The ones who don't even think about it--those are the dangerous ones, running around like child soldiers wielding great big  guns.  Deep down, we know.  We know why we're doing what we're doing?  Pride? Envy? Resentment? Take-no-prisoners selfishness?  Proving something--as in, I'll show them?

All I'm saying is, if we pay close attention to our motivations, we know.  And what we know about ourselves will protect us--and those around us.

share:
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
Line Break
  • Jen
    Hi Dani:

    I returned to this blog post today because I wanted to re-read your thoughts. I'm struggling with the concept of betrayal. I have all this work I really dig, stuff that I've written lately that moves me and excites me because it's good, but I'm afraid to even consider submitting for fear of hurting the people named; the people whose secrets I reveal. Even though the deepest, darkest secrets are actually my own.

    The "what we're doing" in this case, for me? Processing. Completing. Admitting. Expressing my love. But I do fear it won't be received that way. Any additional thoughts or advice since you originally blogged about this?
  • Hi there, Jen. I do think about this all the time. And sometimes I get burned by it. Janet Malcolm famously wrote that writing is always an act of betrayal. I don't entirely subscribe to this, but I do know that part of being a writer is feeling that little "ping" that goes off when you realize you want -- need -- to write about something. It can be as small as a snippet of conversation, or as large as a family dynamic that you want to explore on the page. I try to look at what I'm doing very carefully to be sure that I'm not needlessly or unwittingly hurting anyone. Rarely, I have hurt someone with what I've written -- there have been times when I haven't realized what would offend someone (especially with names changed). The question of how it's received is one over which we don't have that much control. It's a thorny problem, and an ongoing one.
  • Jen
    Thanks for the thoughtful follow up. If you have any additional readings on the topic you might be able to suggest, I'd appreciate it.

    Jen
  • Annie Dillard has some good things to say on the subject on The Writing Life as does Janet Malcolm -- if you've never read The Journalist and the Murderer its a must.
  • Joining the conversation late, and not to be too flippant about what I know is a fraught subject, but I must say, I love writing for kids, where the good guys and bad guys are pretty clear-cut. My conscience is rarely troubled when I base a bad-guy on someone I know or once knew. I find it deeply satisfying to resurrect people from my past life (and some in my kids' lives) and give them their comeuppance in my story. It's saved me a lot of money on therapy. I like to think of it as Nerd Revenge.
  • Cal martin
    David Sedaris has an insightful and hilarious take on this subject on his David Sedaris at Carnegie Hall audio collection .
  • Hi Cal. I need to watch that!
  • The more I write, the more I look at the world as a source of inspiration. But the inspiration is usually quite intimate, and by that I mean the food for discussion is usually about me. So that's the perspective I come from, less about presenting another in my blog at their expense, and more really about presenting their relationships to me and how it affects me. But I'm new to this kind of writing, and I'm learning and evolving and not entirely sure where it's all going to go.
  • This is a conversation I've been having with myself (and thankfully with real life others in a writing class recently.) I'm always reminded of the quote in Throw Momma From the Train, when Billy Crystal's character says "A writer writes, always." This may be true (and is likely true for me, at least figuratively. I am constantly processing and editing my daily interactions inside my head.)

    But just because we're always writing (or processing) doesn't mean it serves a higher purpose. I agree with you that those of us that are mindful about whom our writing may hurt, are less likely to do the hurting. But we also need to be mindful of our intention. Even when it's fiction, not memoir writing. Who are we serving by writing about this character or this occasion? Ourselves (for revenge, to look good, to get a laugh) or the reader?
  • I think about that idea--of intention--a lot when I'm writing, and also when I'm teaching. If we're clear about our intention, that comes through in the prose. I remember, a while back, reading some of the work of Sylvia Boorstein (my Buddhist teacher is also a wonderful writer) and I read a bit of it aloud to my husband. I was trying to puzzle out why it was so good. It's the product of an unconfused mind, was his answer. So true.
  • "A writer's life is her laboratory. Bits and pieces float up to the surface." Yes. Yes. Yes. Sometimes I'll be driving and an idea grabs me and then I must pull the car over to write it down. But the lines? Not clear cut. But with my frequent muses, I either mask their real names (like my kids on my blog) or check with them (adults) before publishing. You pose great questions.
  • Thanks. It's an ongoing challenge, I think. My little ex-urban corner of the world offers me great opportunities for (at the very least) parody on a regular basis. But there, the lines feel very clear cut. After all, my kid is growing up there!
  • Interesting piece. We do need to think about who will be hurt by our work. But in my experience, even if you write wildly inventive fiction, some people in your life will see themselves in it and find reasons to be offended. I guess it all comes down to empathy vs. selfishness/narcissism--on the part of the writer AND the reader.
  • Yes, yes, yes! The rare time someone has been offended by something I've written, I've been like: whaaaa?
    Empathy vs. selfishness -- it's a two way street.
  • Dani,
    Well put. There was an interesting set of articles a while back by writer Joyce Maynard and her daughter after Maynard wrote about her daughter's relationship in a New York Times piece. It provoked a lot of debate among writers about how far we should go in writing about our children's lives. Parents, many felt, were in a slightly different category because they shaped us. It's hard to write about our own lives without writing about our parents. It's hard, too, not to write about our children, and yet there is a difference.

    I like what you write, that if we pay attention to our motivations, we will know whether we are doing the right thing.
    Linda

  • Hey Linda, thanks. Glad you related. There have been several of those "did she go too far?" type pieces. Interesting that they're rarely about the dad. Again, I think this was one of my inspirations for writing Black & White.
  • Have you seen the Bway show Collected Stories? Similar to what you're writing about (I actually blogged about it a few days ago).
  • I actually saw that show years ago when it was first staged in NYC. I think Uta Hagen played the older writer. I remember being jarred by it -- it made me think a lot about that relationship. I loved reading on your blog about your friendship with Mary Gordon. I've had a few of those deep friendships with teachers over the years, and am now close friends with a few of my former students... so rewarding.
  • Beautifully said, as always...
  • Thanks... I really only write when I have something to say. Maybe that's the trick!
blog comments powered by Disqus